Past Programs

Thursday, October 12, 2017

The Right to Vote: Why We’re Headed in the Wrong Direction

Missouri’s confusing new photo ID law, which became effective last June, threatens to deter voters who lack the required state-issued photo ID, said Denise Lieberman. The law disproportionately affects seniors, low-wage workers, women, voters with disabilities, students, and voters of color. Voters without a photo ID are more likely to have difficulty obtaining transportation, time to go to the DMV, or a birth certificate.

Lieberman, a constitutional and civil rights attorney with the Advancement Project, heads the Missouri Voter Protection Coalition, a nonpartisan group of 3,000 organizations, including Women’s Voices Raised for Social Justice.

The coalition questions the high cost of putting the law into practice. Lieberman said the state has allocated only $1.5 million, an amount inadequate to fund voter education, free voter IDs and birth certificates, and training of poll workers. Challenging Missouri’s funding for the law’s implementation, the Advancement Project and the ACLU have filed a lawsuit on behalf of the Missouri NAACP and the League of Women Voters. “People need knowledge and tools to execute their right to vote,” Lieberman said. For voting questions, call Lieberman at the Advancement Project, 314-780-1833, or the Advancement Project, 866-687-8683.

Brandon Alexander and Chrissy Peters, co-directors of the Missouri Elections Division of the Office of the Secretary of State, assured skeptics that the voter ID law will not prevent anyone from voting. Explaining the law’s complex requirements, they said registered voters without a photo ID may vote if they present an approved type of identification and sign a provided statement. If they do not have one of these forms of identification, registered voters may vote a provisional ballot. The ballot may be counted if the person’s signature matches the signature in the voter registry. Audience members questioned the matching’s accuracy.

Alexander said the state will provide a free birth certificate to use in order to obtain a photo ID, and the elections division will help citizens obtain one from another state if necessary. He was unable to predict how long it would take to obtain an individual’s certificate because of varying state requirements.

For help or more information on voting requirements, call or email the office of the Elections Division: 866-868-3245, showit2vote@sos.mo.gov.

Mary Timmel of Jobs With Justice explained the Clean Missouri initiative, which calls for a constitutional amendment to target gerrymandering and promote ethics reform. She said the measure would make Missouri’s voting process fairer by preventing any political party from having an advantage when district maps are redrawn after the next census in 2020. The amendment would require that an independent state demographer, rather than political appointees, create state legislative districts, which would be reviewed by a citizen commission.

The Clean Missouri measure would also require that legislative records be open to the public and that politicians wait two years after leaving office before becoming lobbyists. It would eliminate most lobbyist gifts in the General Assembly and lower campaign contribution limits for state legislative candidates.

Timmel said volunteers are needed to collect 300,000 signatures on the Clean Missouri petition to place the initiative on the ballot. She urged the audience to sign the petition, help gather signatures, donate money, and spread the word. For more information:  www.cleanmissouri.org.

Thursday, September 14, 2017

BIG PHARMA: Market Failure

In our fall kickoff meeting, Women’s Voices members learned about an exciting concept for helping our country become a healthier society: a single-payer health system. Dr. Weisbart, chair of the Missouri chapter of Physicians for a National Health Program, made us laugh and riveted our attention during a fact-filled presentation. The facts left no doubt that we must change our current health care “nonsystem”:

In 2010, the United States spent 18 percent of its gross domestic product (GDP) on health care while Canada spent only 9 percent. Yet Canadians live 3 years longer on average than Americans.

The U.S. annual average per capita expenditure on health care is nearly $10,000, twice as much as that of other developed countries, yet we rank 28th in life expectancy.

In value for our money, we lag far behind other developed countries, all of which have some form of universal coverage. But we can learn from other nations, Dr. Weisbart said.  Canada’s national health insurance program, which employs public funding and private delivery, as does our successful Medicare program, is a model the United States could draw from.

Dr. Weisbart said that our current “wild west” health insurance system, with its complex mixed funding and delivery, is not only peculiar among industrialized nations but also expensively inefficient. The one segment of our system that works well for people is the Medicare program, which has far lower administrative costs than traditional insurance and gives millions of seniors access to comprehensive care. As a result, the life spans of one portion of our population–Medicare recipients–match those in other countries.

Expanding Medicare coverage to the entire population, including members of Congress, would improve Americans’ lives. With universal coverage, families and children would have the same level of care that has benefited seniors. As Dr. Weisbart acknowledged, covering more people raises fear of higher costs. Those fears, however, don’t take account of the great savings that the country would achieve under a single-payer system, like Medicare.

Twenty-five independent studies, Dr. Weisbart said, confirm that a single-payer system could fund care for all U.S. residents through savings from:

  • Increased efficiency. The government would administer only one program instead of many it runs today. States and employers would no longer have the administrative burden of financing health insurance and programs.
  • Less bureaucracy. An expanded Medicare system would dramatically reduce the cost of care by cutting overhead expenses. For example, with everyone on one plan, there would be no need for costly sales and marketing. Insurance companies currently pass millions of expenditures on to purchasers of insurance.
  • Accumulated buying power. A Medicare panel could establish a national formulary and negotiate better prices with providers and drug manufacturers.

Because drug prices drive a major portion of health care expenses, it is especially important that any new plan include measures to control current drug pricing and purchasing practices. Dr. Weisbart said the United States is the only developed country that does not regulate drug prices. “Big Pharma” (pharmaceutical companies) are allowed to set prices without restraint. Also, the Medicare Part D drug program is prohibited by law from negotiating drug prices with drug manufacturers. To keep these rules in place, Big Pharma spends huge amounts of money to employ more than 1,000 lobbyists to influence the U.S. Congress. As a result of legal price gouging and Wall Street fueling big mergers, prices for brand prescription drugs increased 264 percent between 2008 and 2015.

Dr. Weisbart punctured the myth that pharmaceutical manufacturers need to charge heavily to finance their research and development. Returns on drug sales far outpace Big Pharma’s R&D expenses, he said, and taxpayers foot the bill for 80 percent of R & D through funding to entities such as the National Science Foundation and universities.

The audience viewed the documentary, “Big Pharma: Market Failure,” which contains much more information about the corruption in drug pricing. It also focuses on how the rising cost of prescription drugs is affecting families and businesses. The average family is now spending $4,270 annually on prescription drugs. Twenty million Americans did not fill their prescriptions because of cost (2015 study). In 2015, American businesses paid $660 billion for employees’ health insurance, a figure that is projected to rise to $1 trillion by 2022 if nothing changes. Many companies find themselves declaring bankruptcy, closing, or freezing employees’ wages.

Dr. Weisbart is hopeful that the time is right for a single-payer system. Many physicians, politicians, and citizens support the model. Two bills have been introduced in Congress (HB 676 and Bernie Sanders Medicare-for-All-Act of 2017). To help him spread the word, Dr. Weisbart urged audience members to contact him to arrange a speaking event: pnhpMO.org, PNHP-MO Facebook page.

Past Programs 2016-2017

Past Programs 2015-2016

Past Programs 2014-2015

Past Programs 2013-2014

Past Programs 2012-2013

Past Programs 2011-2012

Past Programs 2010-2011

Past Programs 2009-2010

Past Programs 2008-2009

Past Programs 2007-2008

Past Programs 2006-2007

Past Programs 2005-2006